 |
|
article
Operating Efficiencies:
Redesigning Service Delivery for Current Customer Needs
Retail banking customers are changing the way they use and obtain
banking services. Mounting evidence has reinforced a need to think
carefully about redesigning delivery systems to make the continuing
shift seamless. It is startling to realize that more customers now
prefer to handle routine transactions online than in a branch. The
vast majority of bank customers look up their balances online, with
some studies reporting the figure to be 85%. Most also prefer online
funds transfer over a branch visit. Further, in working with current
clients, we are finding a dramatic reduction in branch teller
transactions year over year—on the order of 20% from 2010 to 2011,
in some cases.
This shift in customer preferences is underway, and our delivery
channels need to be redesigned to accommodate the current and
imminent wishes of customers at each touch point. How do banks make
this transition when, too often, decision making on design does not
involve customers’ quantified preferences in the equation? It is
time for banks to also rethink their redesign methodology.
In the early 1980s, under the banner of Quality Improvement, the
customer became a central focus for improvement initiatives, with
surveys, studies, and testing introduced into change processes. Over
time, those labor-intensive techniques were replaced because of a
need for “speed to decision.” Well-meaning management teams returned
to their previous approach of thinking that they know what customers
want and designing to the standards and beliefs of the line or IT
management.
It is time to return to involving customers in the redesign process by
studying their preferences and incorporating them into design. In
our discussions with bank CEOs, the overwhelming strategic objective
for 2011 is to reduce operating expenses through realized operating
efficiencies. The new fee income realities brought about by
regulation changes have mandated a closer look at operating
expenses, creating an ideal opportunity to re-engage customers in
the process.
The most recent J.D. Power study, which surveyed more than 48,000
retail bank customers across the United States, indicates a struggle
to satisfy customers’ needs. This represents a four-year downward
trend, and it must be observed that traditional methods, such as
greeting in the branch and cleaning up the branch experience, will
not suffice for a customer base that is trending to online service.
Here’s a great opportunity to win customers back and lower operating
expenses at the same time. It is time to go back to those quality
principles that got so much attention in the early 1980s by
designing according to customers' needs.
|
|