maximizing results with technology-enabled business process
reengineering
By Greg Robinson
I’ve spent the majority of my career working in the gap
(sometimes a chasm) between the technology side and the business operations
side of organizations. This can be tricky, and sometimes a downright risky
position.
I attribute this risk to the fact that both sides are highly
committed to helping the organization, but sometimes have different ideas about
what’s most important in helping the organization to succeed. Some believe that
the business should be adapted to take advantage of technology, while others
believe technology should be adapted to support the business.
This slight twist in priorities often rears its head when
companies begin to look at improvement initiatives. Many technologists will
argue that you first install the technology, and then you change processes to
take advantage of the technology. They’ll say, “How can you improve the process if you don’t know about
the technology to be used and what it can do?”
Process purists will just as adamantly argue that you should
improve the processes and then add technology to automate the remaining
activities. Their point is that if you don’t improve the process first, you
will end up automating a bad process.
I think both arguments are correct. The technology industry
has created some excellent technologies, and it is important to know what
technologies are available and what they can do to ensure that you’re achieving
the maximum potential in an improvement initiative. It is also important to
ensure that the focus remains on improving the business, not installing the
technology. In order to maximize the impact of the technology and the
improvement to the business, you must integrate the technology and the process.
This type of initiative is what I refer to as “Technology-enabled Business
Process Reengineering.”
To succeed at this type of initiative, you first have to be
clear about what you’re trying to improve and why. Are you trying to improve
service, profitability, quality or a combination of these? If the endpoint is not clear, the path will
be even less clear.
Next, it is important to know what technologies are
available and how they can help to address the need. Should you select a
specific technology (platform, application, vendor, etc.) at this time? This is
an important point of distinction. How do you know which solution will be the
most effective without knowing how you’re going to change the process?
For example, we know we need to turn a paper document into
an image, capture the data from the document and then automate the movement of
the data throughout a number of steps in a process. Almost any combination of
image, OCR and automated workflow technology can do this. Some vendors provide
all three—others provide one or a combination of these technologies—but the
important thing at this point is that the technology exists and that you
maximize its use in the process. While you are redesigning the processes, you can begin your systems selection
process. This will help you learn more about the technologies and potential
vendors and allow you to begin narrowing in on those that will best fit your
situation.
Once you have redesigned your processes using a technology enabled
business process reengineering approach, you are now ready to select the
specific technologies and vendors that will best fit your design. In fact,
knowing how you are going to use the technology will allow you to be more
specific with vendors as to what your needs are, and those who are most
qualified to fit your needs will rise to the top. Those that are really
interested in improving your business and maximizing your value will likely be
able to suggest additional enhancements and further refine the design.
Improvement initiatives are usually difficult and
complicated. Going in, you should have as many elements in your favor as
possible, and try to achieve maximum benefits. Will a technology-enabled business process reengineering
approach—or anything else—guarantee that your initiative is successful? No, but
anything short of this integrated approach will decrease your odds of success
and will reduce the overall benefits that you achieve.