self-service adoption
By
Ed Fenwick
Senior Vice President
Self-service is a growing strategy for more
and more insurance companies. The push has its roots primarily in
expense reduction but increasingly, it has an element of responding
to customer demand. However, there is one significant issue haunting
the business case for most of these efforts—adoption rate.
Recent studies have shown that durable adoption rates in our
industry are hovering around 15% with some achieving as high as 25%.
That is either good or bad, depending on what the going-in
expectation was. Either way, it is a long way from shutting down the
call center and pocketing that entire expense savings.
So what are the barriers to adoption and what can be done to
overcome them?
Ownership
A mixed bag of capabilities with varying degrees of usability
and complexity will kill adoption. The chaos you often experience as
a consumer with Web self-service is rarely a technology issue;
rather, it is almost certainly the lack of a single, coherent
approach and leadership in the organization that put it together.
Cross-functional process ownership is minimal table stakes for
development of an adoptable self-service capability. If the
self-service is aimed at producers or agents, ownership across the
various functions is even more important. If it is simple to get
their underwriting status but impossible to figure out a commission
issue, they will default to the phone, where they can have all of
their questions answered—even if it takes a transfer or two.
Customer ROI
The organization’s ROI on self-service will never happen until
the customer’s ROI is high. Customer ROI is a simple formula—the
certainty of benefit has to exceed the anticipated effort; the
higher that ratio, the faster and more durable the adoption of
self-service will be. That formula has to work with each and every
engagement, from sign up to initial use and through repeated use.
Companies with self-service capabilities are getting about a third
of their new customers to sign up but lose more than half who never
move into the user category. At every aspect of the offering, tight
focus needs to be given to the customers’ perception of benefit and
anticipated effort to maximize adoption.
Cross-Service Channel Consistency
A consistent way to access and use all of your service channels
will help self-service adoption, but the consistent way has to be
customer-oriented and easy. Requiring a policy number (a 10-digit,
random set of numbers) to access services is not
customer-oriented or easy. Opposed to completing a transaction over
the phone, the website requires you to download a form—neither
consistent nor easy. Companies with high self-service adoption rates
have worked hard on these consistency and ease-of-use issues. For
example, at one company, customers can choose their unique user ID
and password which are used to access any service channel. The ease
of use encourages customers’ utilization of self-service systems.
Training
One airline made a bold decision when they implemented
self-service kiosks. They took people from behind the counter
working the traditional long queue of passengers and moved them out
to the kiosks, helping customers learn how to use them. The
traditional service lines grew longer, but self-service adoption
took off. This airline staffed the kiosk training heavily for over a
year after introduction and as a result, they have the highest
adoption rate of any airline and the shortest, lowest-staffed
traditional service stations of any US carrier.
Your self-service strategy has to include strong capabilities for
providing live help. In the short run, this may drive up call center
demand but it is critical to high adoption rates.
Conclusion
Self-service can work but it takes a solid, comprehensive
approach. In successful companies, it is not just an IT initiative;
rather, it is more about bringing together process management and
customer experience management—that is the winning formula.